Received: from mail.webcom.com (mail.webcom.com [206.2.192.68]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id SAA06907 for <DWARNER@ALBANY.NET>; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 18:37:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA227775891; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:38:11 -0800
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 15:38:11 -0800
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Message-Id: <1394.6625T1031T2433@mt-inc.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@ALBANY.NET
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: johnc@mt-inc.com (John Crookshank)
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Re: Video Editing Software Queation
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
On 21-Feb-96 12:01:16, Kenneth.George.Haben (Kenneth.George.Haben@att.com) Emailed:
> I know this is not directly Lightwave related, but I will use it for
> editing my Lightwave animations etc.
> Question:
> IS Premiere, or Razor Pro, the better choice for a 166mhz Pentium based
> Perception video recorder system running Windows 95?
> I know about speed Razor mach III, but it is an NT only product.
> Are there other packages that are better?
You don't mention what hardware you're using to edit with. If it's a
Perception, WinNT and Speed Razor are the best choice, since they work
directly with the PVR hardware, and don't need any "convert to .avi" steps
for all your files before you can use them. This makes the editing process
MUCH faster.
You have to have WinNT and SpeedRazor, not Razor pro to to this.